Sponsors: Pozycjonowanie | Projekty domów | wycieczki Bułgaria | play poker online | Przeprowadzki Chorzów

Get a free blog at Retards4u.com



Depression and Anxiety Treatment

August 15th, 2006

Serotonin and Depression: A Disconnect between the Advertisements and the Scientific Literature

Posted by depressionandanxietytreatment in anxiety treatment

Jeffrey R. Lacasse, Jonathan Leo*

Jeffrey R. Lacasse is at Florida State University College of Social Work, Tallahassee, Florida, United States of America. Jonathan Leo is at Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, Florida, United States of America.

Competing Interests: The authors declare that no competing interests exist and that they received no funding for this work.

Published: November 8, 2005

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020392

Copyright: © 2005 Lacasse and Leo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abbreviations: DTCA, direct-to-consumer advertising; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor

Citation: Lacasse JR, Leo J (2005) Serotonin and Depression: A Disconnect between the Advertisements and the Scientific Literature. PLoS Med 2(12): e392

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jleo1@tampabay.rr.com


In the United States, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants are advertised directly to consumers [1]. These highly successful direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) campaigns have largely revolved around the claim that SSRIs correct a chemical imbalance caused by a lack of serotonin (see Tables 1 and 2). For instance, sertraline (Zoloft) was the sixth best-selling medication in the US in 2004, with over $3 billion in sales [2] likely due, at least in part, to the widely disseminated advertising campaign starring Zoloft’s miserably depressed ovoid creature. Research has demonstrated that class-wide SSRI advertising has expanded the size of the antidepressant market [3], and SSRIs are now among the best-selling drugs in medical practice [2].

Table 1. Selected Quotations Regarding Serotonin and Antidepressants

Table 2. Selected Consumer Advertisements from SSRIs from Print, Television, and the World Wide Web

Given the multifactorial nature of depression and anxiety, and the ambiguities inherent in psychiatric diagnosis and treatment, some have questioned whether the mass provision of SSRIs is the result of an over-medicalized society. These sentiments were voiced by Lord Warner, United Kingdom Health Minister, at a recent hearing: “…I have some concerns that sometimes we do, as a society, wish to put labels on things which are just part and parcel of the human condition”[4]. He went on to say, “Particularly in the area of depression we did ask the National Institute for Clinical Excellence [an independent health organisation that provides national guidance on treatment and prevention] to look into this particular area and their guideline on depression did advise non-pharmacological treatment for mild depression” [4]. Sentiments such as Lord Warner’s, about over-medicalization, are exactly what some pharmaceutical companies have sought to overcome with their advertising campaigns. For example, Pfizer’s television advertisement for the antidepressant sertraline (Zoloft) stated that depression is a serious medical condition that may be due to a chemical imbalance, and that “Zoloft works to correct this imbalance” [5]. Other SSRI advertising campaigns have also claimed that depression is linked with an imbalance of the neurotransmitter serotonin, and that SSRIs can correct this imbalance (see Table 2). The pertinent question is: are the claims made in SSRI advertising congruent with the scientific evidence?

The Serotonin Hypothesis

In 1965, Joseph Schildkraut put forth the hypothesis that depression was associated with low levels of norepinephrine [6], and later researchers theorized that serotonin was the neurotransmitter of interest [7]. In subsequent years, there were numerous attempts to identify reproducible neurochemical alterations in the nervous systems of patients diagnosed with depression. For instance, researchers compared levels of serotonin metabolites in the cerebrospinal fluid of clinically depressed suicidal patients to controls, but the primary literature is mixed and plagued with methodological difficulties such as very small sample sizes and uncontrolled confounding variables. In a recent review of these studies, the chairman of the German Medical Board and colleagues stated, “Reported associations of subgroups of suicidal behavior (e.g. violent suicide attempts) with low CSF–5HIAA [serotonin] concentrations are likely to represent somewhat premature translations of findings from studies that have flaws in methodology” [8]. Attempts were also made to induce depression by depleting serotonin levels, but these experiments reaped no consistent results [9]. Likewise, researchers found that huge increases in brain serotonin, arrived at by administering high-dose L-tryptophan, were ineffective at relieving depression [10].

(Illustration: Margaret Shear, Public Library of Science)

Contemporary neuroscience research has failed to confirm any serotonergic lesion in any mental disorder, and has in fact provided significant counterevidence to the explanation of a simple neurotransmitter deficiency. Modern neuroscience has instead shown that the brain is vastly complex and poorly understood [11]. While neuroscience is a rapidly advancing field, to propose that researchers can objectively identify a “chemical imbalance” at the molecular level is not compatible with the extant science. In fact, there is no scientifically established ideal “chemical balance” of serotonin, let alone an identifiable pathological imbalance. To equate the impressive recent achievements of neuroscience with support for the serotonin hypothesis is a mistake.

With direct proof of serotonin deficiency in any mental disorder lacking, the claimed efficacy of SSRIs is often cited as indirect support for the serotonin hypothesis. Yet, this ex juvantibus line of reasoning (i.e., reasoning “backwards” to make assumptions about disease causation based on the response of the disease to a treatment) is logically problematic—the fact that aspirin cures headaches does not prove that headaches are due to low levels of aspirin in the brain. Serotonin researchers from the US National Institute of Mental Health Laboratory of Clinical Science clearly state, “[T]he demonstrated efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors…cannot be used as primary evidence for serotonergic dysfunction in the pathophysiology of these disorders” [12].

Reasoning backwards, from SSRI efficacy to presumed serotonin deficiency, is thus highly contested. The validity of this reasoning becomes even more unlikely when one considers recent studies that even call into question the very efficacy of the SSRIs. Irving Kirsch and colleagues, using the Freedom of Information Act, gained access to all clinical trials of antidepressants submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by the pharmaceutical companies for medication approval. When the published and unpublished trials were pooled, the placebo duplicated about 80% of the antidepressant response [13]; 57% of these pharmaceutical company–funded trials failed to show a statistically significant difference between antidepressant and inert placebo [14]. A recent Cochrane review suggests that these results are inflated as compared to trials that use an active placebo [15]. This modest efficacy and extremely high rate of placebo response are not seen in the treatment of well-studied imbalances such as insulin deficiency, and casts doubt on the serotonin hypothesis.

Also problematic for the serotonin hypothesis is the growing body of research comparing SSRIs to interventions that do not target serotonin specifically. For instance, a Cochrane systematic review found no major difference in efficacy between SSRIs and tricyclic antidepressants [16]. In addition, in randomized controlled trials, buproprion [17] and reboxetine [18] were just as effective as the SSRIs in the treatment of depression, yet neither affects serotonin to any significant degree. St. John’s Wort [19] and placebo [20] have outperformed SSRIs in recent randomized controlled trials. Exercise was found to be as effective as the SSRI sertraline in a randomized controlled trial [21]. The research and development activities of pharmaceutical companies also illustrate a diminishing role for serotonergic intervention—Eli Lilly, the company that produced fluoxetine (Prozac), recently released duloxetine, an antidepressant designed to impact norepinephrine as well as serotonin. The evidence presented above thus seems incompatible with a specific serotonergic lesion in depression.

Although SSRIs are considered “antidepressants,” they are FDA-approved treatments for eight separate psychiatric diagnoses, ranging from social anxiety disorder to obsessive-compulsive disorder to premenstrual dysphoric disorder. Some consumer advertisements (such as the Zoloft and Paxil Web sites) promote the serotonin hypothesis, not just for depression, but also for some of these other diagnostic categories [22,23]. Thus, for the serotonin hypothesis to be correct as currently presented, serotonin regulation would need to be the cause (and remedy) of each of these disorders [24]. This is improbable, and no one has yet proposed a cogent theory explaining how a singular putative neurochemical abnormality could result in so many wildly differing behavioral manifestations.

In short, there exists no rigorous corroboration of the serotonin theory, and a significant body of contradictory evidence. Far from being a radical line of thought, doubts about the serotonin hypothesis are well acknowledged by many researchers, including frank statements from prominent psychiatrists, some of whom are even enthusiastic proponents of SSRI medications (see Table 1).

However, in addition to what these authors say about serotonin, it is also important to look at what is not said in the scientific literature. To our knowledge, there is not a single peer-reviewed article that can be accurately cited to directly support claims of serotonin deficiency in any mental disorder, while there are many articles that present counterevidence. Furthermore, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), which is published by the American Psychiatric Association and contains the definitions of all psychiatric diagnoses, does not list serotonin as a cause of any mental disorder. The American Psychiatric Press Textbook of Clinical Psychiatry addresses serotonin deficiency as an unconfirmed hypothesis, stating, “Additional experience has not confirmed the monoamine depletion hypothesis” [25].

Consumer Advertisements of Antidepressants

Contrary to what many people believe, the FDA does not require preapproval of advertisements. Instead, the FDA monitors the advertisements once they are in print or on the air [26]. Misleading content is frequently found in various DTCA campaigns [27]; hence, it is valuable to compare SSRI advertisements to the scientific evidence reviewed above. These SSRI ads are widely promulgated; hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent disseminating these advertisements, and one study found that over 70% of surveyed patients reported exposure to antidepressant DTCA [28].

The Role of the FDA

In the US, the FDA monitors and regulates DTCA. The FDA requires that advertisements “cannot be false or misleading” and “must present information that is not inconsistent with the product label” [27]. Pharmaceutical companies that disseminate advertising incompatible with these requirements can receive warning letters and can be sanctioned. The Irish equivalent of the FDA, the Irish Medical Board, recently banned GlaxoSmithKline from claiming that paroxetine corrects a chemical imbalance even in their patient information leaflets [29]. Should the FDA take similar action against consumer advertisements of SSRIs?

As just one example, the prescribing information for paroxetine, which is typical of the SSRI-class drugs, states, “The efficacy of paroxetine in the treatment of major depressive disorder, social anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), panic disorder (PD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is presumed to be linked to potentiation of serotonergic activity in the central nervous system resulting from inhibition of neuronal reuptake of serotonin. Studies at clinically relevant doses in humans have demonstrated that paroxetine blocks the uptake of serotonin into human platelets” [30].

In other words, the mechanism of action of paroxetine has not been definitively established, and remains unconfirmed and presumptive (the prescribing information states that the efficacy of the drug “is presumed to be linked to potentiation of serotonergic activity” ([30], our italics added). Although there is evidence that paroxetine inhibits the reuptake of serotonin, the significance of this phenomenon in the amelioration of psychiatric symptoms is unknown, and continually debated [12,31]. Most importantly, the prescribing information does not mention a serotonin deficiency in those administered paroxetine, nor does it claim that paroxetine corrects an imbalance of serotonin. In contrast, the consumer advertisements for paroxetine present claims that are not found in this FDA-approved product labeling.

In order to determine whether these advertisements actually comply with FDA regulations, it is useful to consult the Code of Federal Regulations under which DTCA is regulated. The regulations state that an advertisement may be cited as false or misleading if it “[c]ontains claims concerning the mechanism or site of drug action that are not generally regarded as established by scientific evidence by experts qualified by scientific training and experience without disclosing that the claims are not established and the limitations of the supporting evidence…” ([32], our emphasis added]).

Stating that depression may be due to a serotonin deficiency is seemingly allowed, but, as stated in the regulations, only if the limitations of the supporting evidence are provided. In our examination of SSRI advertisements, we did not locate a single advertisement that presented any such information. Instead, the serotonin hypothesis is typically presented as a collective scientific belief, as in the Zoloft advertisement, which states that regarding depression, “Scientists believe that it could be linked with an imbalance of a chemical in the brain called serotonin” [33]. Consumers viewing such advertisements remain uninformed regarding the limitations of the serotonin hypothesis (reviewed above).

According to federal regulations, advertisements are also proscribed from including content that “contains favorable information or opinions about a drug previously regarded as valid but which have been rendered invalid by contrary and more credible recent information” [32].

This means that a disconnect between the evolving peer-reviewed literature and advertisements is not permitted. Regarding SSRIs, there is a growing body of medical literature casting doubt on the serotonin hypothesis, and this body is not reflected in the consumer advertisements. In particular, many SSRI advertisements continue to claim that the mechanism of action of SSRIs is that of correcting a chemical imbalance, such as a paroxetine advertisement, which states, “With continued treatment, Paxil can help restore the balance of serotonin…” [22]. Yet, as previously mentioned, there is no such thing as a scientifically established correct “balance” of serotonin. The take-home message for consumers viewing SSRI advertisements is probably that SSRIs work by normalizing neurotransmitters that have gone awry. This was a hopeful notion 30 years ago, but is not an accurate reflection of present-day scientific evidence.

The FDA has sent ten warning letters to antidepressant manufacturers since 1997 [34–43], but has never cited a pharmaceutical company for the issues covered here. The reasons for their inaction are unclear but seem to result from a deliberate decision at some level of the FDA, rather than an oversight. Since 2002, the first author (JRL) has repeatedly contacted the FDA regarding these issues. The only substantive response was an E-mail received from a regulatory reviewer at the FDA: “Your concern regarding direct-to-consumer advertising raises an interesting issue regarding the validity of reductionistic statements. These statements are used in an attempt to describe the putative mechanisms of neurotransmitter action(s) to the fraction of the public that functions at no higher than a 6th grade reading level” (personal communication, 2002 April 11).

It is curious that these advertisements are rationalized as being appropriate for those with poor reading skills. If the issues surrounding antidepressants are too complex to explain accurately to the general public, one wonders why it is imperative that DTCA of antidepressants be permitted at all. However, contrary to what the FDA seems to be implying, truth and simplicity are not mutually exclusive. Consider the medical textbook, Essential Psychopharmacology, which states, “So far, there is no clear and convincing evidence that monoamine deficiency accounts for depression; that is, there is no ‘real’ monoamine deficit” [44]. Like the pharmaceutical company advertisements, this explanation is very easy to understand, yet it paints a very different picture about the serotonin hypothesis.

Conclusion

The impact of the widespread promotion of the serotonin hypothesis should not be underestimated. Antidepressant advertisements are ubiquitous in American media, and there is emerging evidence that these advertisements have the potential to confound the doctor–patient relationship. A recent study by Kravitz et al. found that pseudopatients (actors who were trained to behave as patients) presenting with symptoms of adjustment disorder (a condition for which antidepressants are not usually prescribed) were frequently prescribed paroxetine (Paxil) by their physicians if they inquired specifically about Paxil [45]; such enquiries from actual patients could be prompted by DTCA [45].

What remains unmeasured, though, is how many patients seek help from their doctor because antidepressant advertisements have convinced them that they are suffering from a serotonin deficiency. These advertisements present a seductive concept, and the fact that patients are now presenting with a self-described “chemical imbalance” [46] shows that the DTCA is having its intended effect: the medical marketplace is being shaped in a way that is advantageous to the pharmaceutical companies. Recently, it has been alleged that the FDA is more responsive to the concerns of the pharmaceutical industry than to their mission of protecting US consumers, and that enforcement efforts are being relaxed [47]. Patients who are convinced they are suffering from a neurotransmitter defect are likely to request a prescription for antidepressants, and may be skeptical of physicians who suggest other interventions, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy [48], evidence-based or not. Like other vulnerable populations, anxious and depressed patients “are probably more susceptible to the controlling influence of advertisements” [49].

In 1998, at the dawn of consumer advertising of SSRIs, Professor Emeritus of Neuroscience Elliot Valenstein summarized the scientific data by concluding, “What physicians and the public are reading about mental illness is by no means a neutral reflection of all the information that is available” [50]. The current state of affairs has only confirmed the veracity of this conclusion. The incongruence between the scientific literature and the claims made in FDA-regulated SSRI advertisements is remarkable, and possibly unparalleled.

References

  1. Mintzes B (2002) For and against: Direct to consumer advertising is medicalising normal human experience: For. BMJ 324: 908–909. Find this article online
  2. International Marketing Services Health (2004) Year-end U.S. Prescription and sales information and commentary. Fairfield. (Connecticut): International Marketing Services Health Available: http://www.imshealth.com/ims/portal/front/articleC/0,2777,6599_3665_69890098,00.html. Accessed 14 October 2005.
  3. Donohue J, Berndt E (2004) Effects of direct-to-consumer advertising on medication choice: The case of antidepressants. J Pub Pol Marketing 23: 115–127. Find this article online
  4. United Kingdom Parliament (2005) House of Commons health report. London: United Kingdom House of Commons. Available: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmhealth/42/4202.htm. Accessed 14 October 2005.
  5. Pfizer (2004 March) Zoloft advertisement. Burbank (California): NBC.
  6. Schildkraut JJ (1965) The catecholamine hypothesis of affective disorders: A review of supporting evidence. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 7: 524–533. Find this article online
  7. Coppen A (1967) The biochemistry of affective disorders. Br J Psychiatry 113: 1237–1264. Find this article online
  8. Roggenbach J, Müller-Oerlinghausen B, Franke L (2002) Suicidality, impulsivity, and aggression-Is there a link to 5HIAA concentration in the cerebrospinal fluid? Psychiatry Res 113: 193–206. Find this article online
  9. Heninger G, Delgado P, Charney D (1996) The revised monoamine theory of depression: A modulatory role for monoamines, based on new findings from monoamine depletion experiments in humans. Pharmacopsychiatry 29: 2–11. Find this article online
  10. Mendels J, Stinnett J, Burns D, Frazer A (1975) Amine precursors and depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 32: 22–30. Find this article online
  11. Horgan J (1999) The undiscovered mind: How the human brain defies replication, medication, and explanation. New York: Free Press. 336 p.
  12. Murphy DL, Andrews AM, Wichems CH, Li Q, Tohda M, et al. (1998) Brain serotonin neurotransmission: An overview and update with emphasis on serotonin subsystem heterogeneity, multiple receptors, interactions with other neurotransmitter systems, and consequent implications for understanding the actions of serotonergic drugs. J Clin Psychiatry 59: 4–12. Find this article online
  13. Kirsch I, Moore TJ, Scoboria A, Nicholls SS (2002) The emperor’s new drugs: An analysis of antidepressant medication data submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Prev Treat 5. article 23. Available: http://journals.apa.org/prevention/volume5/pre0050023a.html. Accessed 14 October 2005.
  14. Kirsch I, Scoboria A, Moore TJ (2002) Antidepressants and placebos: Secrets, revelations, and unanswered questions. Prev Treat 5. article 33. Available: http://journals.apa.org/prevention/volume5/pre0050033r.html. Accessed 14 October 2005.
  15. Moncrieff J, Wessely S, Hardy R (2005) Active placebos versus antidepressant for depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004: CD003012. Find this article online
  16. Geddes J, Freemantle N, Mason J, Eccles M, Boynton J (2005) Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) versus other antidepressants for depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000: CD002791. Find this article online
  17. Karvoussi R, Segraves R, Hughes A, Ascher J, Johnston J (1997) Double-blind comparison of bupropion sustained release and sertraline in depressed outpatients. J Clin Psychiatry 12: 532–537. Find this article online
  18. Schatzberg A (2000) Clinical efficacy of reboxetine in major depression. J Clin Psychiatry 61. Suppl 10 31–38. Find this article online
  19. Szegedi A, Kohnen R, Dienel A, Kieser M (2005) Acute treatment of moderate to severe depression with hypericum extract WS 5570 (St John’s wort): Randomised controlled double-blind non-inferiority trial versus paroxetine. BMJ 330: 503. Find this article online
  20. Hypericum Depression Trial Study Group (2002) Effect of Hypericum perforatum (St John’s wort) in major depressive disorder: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 287: 1807–1814. Find this article online
  21. Blumenthal J, Babyak M, Moore K, Craighead W, Herman S, et al. (1999) Effects of exercise training on older patients with major depression. Arch Intern Med 159: 2349–2356. Find this article online
  22. GlaxoSmithKline (2005) What does Paxil treat. London: GlaxoSmithKline. Available: http://www.paxil.com/about/ab_trt.html. Accessed 2005 14 October 2005.
  23. Pfizer (2002) Zoloft for PMDD. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Pfizer. Available: http://zoloftforpmdd.about.com/. Accessed 14 October 2005.
  24. Healy D (2002) The creation of psychopharmacology. Cambridge: Harvard University. 313 p.
  25. Dubvosky S, Davies R, Dubvosky A, (2003) Mood disorders. In: Hales R, Yudofsky S, editors. The American psychiatric textbook of clinical psychiatry, 4th ed. Washington (D.C.): American Psychiatric Press. pp 439–542.
  26. Consumer Reports (2003) Free rein for drug ads. Yonkers (New York): Consumer Reports Available: http://www.consumerreports.org/main/detailv2.jsp?CONTENT%3C%3Ecnt_id=299631&FOLDER%3C%3Efolder_id=162687. Accessed 14 October 2005.
  27. United States General Accounting Office (2002) Prescription drugs: FDA oversight of direct-to-consumer advertising has limitations. Washington (D.C.): United States General Accounting Office. Available: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d03177.pdf. Accessed 2005 February 19.
  28. Mintzes B, Barer ML, Kravitz RL, Basett K, Lexchin J, et al. (2003) How does direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) affect prescribing? A survey in primary care environments with and without legal DTCA. CMAJ 169: 405–412. Find this article online
  29. O’Brien C (2003 October 5) Drug firm to drop non-addiction claim. Irish Times.
  30. GlaxoSmithKline (2005) Paxil Prescribing Information. Research Triangle Park (North Carolina): GlaxoSmithKine. Available: http://us.gsk.com/products/assets/us_paxil.pdf. Accessed 14 October 2005.
  31. Castren E (2005) Is mood chemistry? Nat Rev Neuroscience 6: 241–226. Find this article online
  32. Food and Drug Administration (2005) Code of federal regulations, 21CFR202. Title 21—Food and drugs. Chapter I—Food and drug administration. Department of Health and Human Services. Part 202—Prescription-drug advertisements. Available: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?CFRPart=202&showFR=1. Accessed 14 October 2005.
  33. Pfizer (2005) Learning about depression: What causes depression. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Pfizer. Available: http://www.zoloft.com/zoloft/zoloft.portal?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=depr_causes Accessed 17 October 2005.
  34. Food and Drug Administration Division of Drug Marketing Advertising and Communications (1997) Effexor warning letter. Rockville (Maryland): Food and Drug Administration. Available: http://www.fda.gov/cder/warn/june97/effexor.pdf. Accessed 14 October 2005.
  35. Food and Drug Administration Division of Drug Marketing Advertising and Communications (1998) Paxil warning letter. Rockville (Maryland): Food and Drug Administration. Available: http://www.fda.gov/cder/warn/mar98/6383.pdf. Accessed 14 October 2005.
  36. Food and Drug Administration Division of Drug Marketing Advertising and Communications (1999) Remeron warning letter. Rockville (Maryland): Food and Drug Administration. Available: http://www.fda.gov/cder/warn/jan99/6950.pdf. Accessed 2005 May 9.
  37. Food and Drug Administration Division of Drug Marketing Advertising and Communications (2000) Sarafem warning letter. Rockville (Maryland): Food and Drug Administration. Available: http://www.fda.gov/cder/warn/nov2000/dd9523.pdf. Accessed 14 October 2005.
  38. Food and Drug Administration Division of Drug Marketing Advertising and Communications (2000) Effexor warning letter. Rockville (Maryland): Food and Drug Administration. Available: http://www.fda.gov/cder/warn/oct2000/dd8741.pdf. Accessed 14 October 2005.
  39. Food and Drug Administration Division of Drug Marketing Advertising and Communications (2000) Remeron warning letter. Rockville (Maryland): Food and Drug Administration. Available: http://www.fda.gov/cder/warn/apr2000/dd8496.pdf. Accessed 14 October 2005.
  40. Food and Drug Administration Division of Drug Marketing Advertising and Communications (2002) Celexa warning letter. Available: http://www.fda.gov/cder/warn/2002/10853Celexa.pdf. Accessed 14 October 2005.
  41. Food and Drug Administration Division of Drug Marketing Advertising and Communications (2004) Effexor warning letter. Rockville (Maryland): Food and Drug Administration. Available: http://www.fda.gov/cder/warn/2004/Effexor.pdf. Accessed 14 October 2005.
  42. Food and Drug Administration Division of Drug Marketing Advertising and Communications (2004) Paxil warning letter. Rockville (Maryland): Food and Drug Administration. Available: http://www.fda.gov/cder/warn/2004/MACMIS12439.pdf. Accessed 14 October 2005.
  43. Food and Drug Administration Division of Drug Marketing Advertising and Communications (2005) Zoloft warning letter. Rockville (Maryland): Food and Drug Administration. Available: http://www.fda.gov/cder/warn/2005/zoloft_letter.pdf. Accessed 14 October 2005.
  44. Stahl SM (2000) Essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 601 p.
  45. Kravitz RL, Epstein RM, Feldman MD, Franz CE, Azari R, et al. (2005) Influence of patients’ requests for direct-to-consumer advertised antidepressants: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 293: 1995–2002. Find this article online
  46. Kramer TAM (2002) Endogenous versus exogenous: Still not the issue. MedGenMed 4 Available: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/418269. Accessed 14 October 2005.
  47. Angell M (2004) The truth about the drug companies: How they deceive us and what to do about it. New York: Random House. 336 p.
  48. DeRubeis R, Hollon S, Amsterdam J, Shelton R, Young P, et al. (2005) Cognitive therapy vs medications in the treatment of moderate to severe depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 62: 409–416. Find this article online
  49. Hollon MF (2004) Direct-to-consumer marketing of prescription drugs: A current perspective for neurologists and psychiatrists. CNS Drugs 18: 69–77. Find this article online
  50. Valenstein ES (1998) Blaming the brain: The truth about drugs and mental health. New York: Free Press. 292 p.
  51. Glenmullen J (2001) Prozac backlash: Overcoming the dangers of prozac, zoloft, paxil and other antidepressants with safe, effective alternatives. New York: Simon and Schuster. 384 p.
  52. Delgado P, Moreno F (2000) Role of norepinephrine in depression. J Clin Psychiatry 61. Supple 1 5–11. Find this article online
  53. Kramer P (2002 July 7) Fighting the darkness in the mind, July 7. The New York Times Sect 4 8.
  54. Lacasse JR, Gomory T (2003) Is graduate social work education promoting a critical approach to mental health practice? J Soc Work Educ 39: 383–408. Find this article online
  55. Healy D (2004) Let them eat prozac: The unhealthy relationship between the pharmaceutical companies and depression. New York: New York University. 351 p.
  56. Kendler KS (2005) Toward a philosophical structure for psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry 162: 433–440. Find this article online
  57. Forest Pharmaceuticals (2005) Frequently asked questions. New York: Forest Pharmaceuticals. Available: http://www.celexa.com/Celexa/faq.aspx. Accessed 17 October 2005.
  58. Forest Pharmaceuticals (2005) How Lexapro (escitalopram) works. New York: Forest Pharmaceuticals. Available: http://www.lexapro.com/english/about_lexapro/how_works.aspx. Accessed 17 October 2005.
  59. Eli Lilly (1998 January) Prozac advertisement. People Magazine: 40.
  60. GlaxoSmithKline (2001 October) Paxil advertisment. Newsweek: 61.
July 26th, 2006

WHAT NEW In THE TREATMENT OF DEPRESSIONS?

Posted by depressionandanxietytreatment in anxiety treatment

RAPIDITY!

The treatment of patients with the depression in our time is definite difficulties. To the practicing doctors it is well known about the wide spectrum and the manifestation of side effects during the application of preparations, which relate to the class of tricyclic antidepressants. This does not make it possible to consider as the their preparations of the first selection in the treatment of depressions today. The antidepressants of the following generations have the more favorable profile of transference, but also they are not deprived of the deficiencies, for example, such as, the appearance of a clinical effect only 2-3 weeks after the beginning of treatment. At present the pharmaceutical company Of lundbek, which has specialization in the field of development, productions and sales of preparations for treating the diseases of central nervous system, prepares for the release in Russia the new antidepressant Of tsipraleks, which will produce revolution in the treatment of depressions.

This is the first representative of the new class of the selective inhibitors of the reverse seizure of the serotonin 2- GO of generation. It will facilitate the symptoms of depression already at the end of the first week of treatment, rabotya more rapid than other antidepressants. New antidepressant will be more effective than the existing antidepressants, possessing in this case excellent transference.

June 2nd, 2006

Prescription Drugs Alone Will Not Cure Depression / Anxiety

Posted by depressionandanxietytreatment in anxiety treatment

by William Nelson, NMD

depression and anxietyAmericans are suffering from depression and anxiety disorders at an alarming rate. At any one time, almost 40 million Americans have one or both conditions. While both men and women suffer from depression and experience the same symptoms, women are disproportionately affected by depression, experiencing it at roughly twice the rate of men. Men with clinical depression are more than twice as likely to develop coronary artery disease, which is the leading cause of death in the US. In 2002, global sales for prescription antidepressants reached $17 billion.

Depression and anxiety disorders can be particularly attributed to a chemical imbalance known as Neurotransmitter Deficiency Disorder (NDD). People with NDD cal also suffer from one or more of the following conditions: obesity, depression, bulimia, anorexia, anxiety, fribromyalgia, chronic fatigue, insomnia, attention deficit, learning disorders, panic attacks, migraines, pms, menopausal symptoms, irritable bowel and many more.

Neurotransmitters (NTs) are essential chemical messengers that regulate brain and muscle, nerve and organ function. The most common neurotransmitters are serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, epinephrine, GABA, histamine and acetylcholine. Low levels of these important chemicals are extremely common in the general public due to poor lifestyle and diet. This article is intended to help the reader determine whether they may be deficient in neurotransmitters and how evaluation and treatment can help.

Conventional treatment uses selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) drugs such as Zoloft, Prozac, etc. which can offer patients symptomatic relief. They work by redistributing serotonin from inside the nerve cell to the synapse where it transmits its chemical message. This artificial redistribution allows for chemical messages to be sent even though the total body NT levels are low.

The problem with this approach is that these drugs DO NOT increase serotonin levels and in fact further depletes NTs. SSRI class drugs cause an increase activity of an enzyme called MAO which breaks down serotonin. It is common for people to experience only temporary improvement due to this effect. The increased MAO activity depletes serotonin until there is not enough for the drug to act on. Conventional research supports this model even though most doctors prescribing these drugs are not aware of this fact.

This is a classic example of a conventional medical treatment that helps with the symptoms but makes the true cause of a condition worse. This approach can be compared with smashing a fire alarm with a sledge hammer because the noise hurts your ears. Your ears stop hurting but the fire is smoldering.

A clinical example of this phenomenon is common to patients on anti-depressant medications. They start on a drug and they feel significant improvement. This can last for months or years until the drug loses its effect. The doctor then suggests taking a drug holiday or prescribes a new prescription and the pattern is repeated.

A symptom questionnaire combined with a simple neurotransmitter urine test is the most effective way to detect a NT deficiency. Many well intentioned doctors are prescribing SSRI drugs, but don’t perform this test to monitor or direct proper treatment.

Neurotransmitters levels can be restored using amino acid therapy. Amino acids are obtained from dietary protein, but not in adequate levels to correct even a moderate NT deficiency. Supplements used in treatment may include 5HTP, tyrosine, DMAE, DLPA, Cysteine, GABA, methionine, mucuna (herbal L-dopa), herbals, and vitamin/mineral cofactors. Once a urine test has identified the NT deficiency, and individualized formulation is given to help replenish the low level NTs.

It takes anywhere from 2 to 18 months or more to restore the NT levels using this approach. Patients that have taken amphetamines, SSRIs, or psychotropics Rx drugs or recreational drugs such as crystal meth and Ecstasy have been found to take longer to respond to therapy. The amino acid supplements are safe and have a side effect profile equal to placebo.

The amino acids are safe when used alone or in combination with prescription drugs. Many conventional and alternative doctors tell patients to never combine amino acids with prescriptions because it is dangerous. In thousands of patient visits using this approach, there have been no problems using them concurrently. Patients that weren’t getting good results with their SSRIs get great results using this approach. Once the symptoms resolve, most patients can slowly wean off their prescription.

After measuring the NT levels to establish a baseline, amino acid therapy is broken down into three phases. Phase one or conditioning increases serotonin levels to prepare the body for the therapeutic stage. This usually takes two weeks. Phase two is the actual therapy that rebuilds both serotonin and dopamine, norepinephrine and epinephrine. Therapy can take anywhere from 2 months to 2 years. Phase three is maintenance whereby supplements are reduced to simply replace the daily NT depletion rate. 90% of patients with this condition will need to stay on a low maintenance dose to avoid the return of symptoms.

The recommendation for patients with symptoms of NDD as well as anyone on prescription antidepressants is to have their neurotransmitter levels evaluated and optimized. Current research and clinical work in this area is incredibly exciting and promising for doctors treating these conditions and patients suffering from them.

Dr. William Nelson is a Naturopathic Medical Doctor who specializes in the treatment of Neurotransmitters Deficiency Disorder by combining the latest medical advances with time-honored naturopathic therapies. The Elements of health Clinic, 7500 E. Pinnacle Peak A-207, Scottsdale, AZ 85255 - (480) 563-4256 or go to www.theelementsofhealth.com

May 6th, 2006

Depression, Eating, and Weight: Interesting Relationships

Posted by depressionandanxietytreatment in anxiety treatment

Depression and obesity represent two major public health problems in the U.S. today. Depression is one of the most common and serious psychological problems. It is estimated that more than 10 percent of Americans are likely to experience at least one major depression during some point in their lives. Obesity, on the other hand, represents the most common physiological problem in the U.S. population. Roughly one-third of all Americans are overweight and at increased risk for morbidity and mortality. [Editor’s note: As of 2002, it is estimated that close to 80 percent of all American adults are overweight.]

The economic costs of obesity are staggering—estimated at more than $30 billion per year. Even more astounding are the recently estimated annual costs (direct-care, morbidity, and mortality) of depression in the U.S.—more than $40 billion.

Depression and overweight frequently co-occur. This should not be surprising since about a third of the population is overweight. Given this high prevalence of overweight, it should not be surprising that depression (a second prevalent problem) is also frequently present among overweight persons. Depression often goes undetected. In fact, a number of studies have found that more than 50 percent of diagnosable clinically-significant depressions are not detected by primary care physicians. Since depression often coexists with obesity, understanding its characteristics and treatment options is important. This is particularly true for overweight persons and health professionals working in the field of weight management.

The relationship between depression, eating, and weight is both interesting and complex. There are many ways that these factors may be related. In this article, I discuss some of the possible associations between depression, eating, and weight control. I also discuss some of the depression treatment options and their implications for eating and weight. I hope this discussion answers many questions while at the same time raises important issues for clients and health professionals to discuss when planning a treatment program.

Depression
Depression is a general term for a variety of conditions ranging from the lay person’s usage conveying temporary states of “feeling blue” or dips in mood to a professional’s usage signifying a psychiatric problem. Several specific types of clinically-meaningful depressions exist. The most common type of depression is referred to as Major Depressive Disorder. The defining symptoms are summarized in the illustration to the right.

Major depression requires the presence of at least one of the following two symptoms:
 A persistent and prolonged period (i.e., minimum of two weeks)
of significantly depressed mood, and/or
 A sustained loss of interest (inability to derive any pleasure)

Besides these mood symptoms, depression requires the presence of several additional symptoms. Generally, the additional symptoms can be divided into three areas. These include:
1.  Thinking (impaired concentration, indecisiveness, worthlessness,
guilt, suicidal thoughts),
2.  Behavior (psychomotor agitation or slowing, decreased activity,
social withdrawal, suicidal behaviors), and
3.  Physical (appetite change, weight change, sleep problems, fatigue).

Major Depressive Disorder
Major Depressive Disorder requires a minimum of five of the following symptoms. The symptoms need to be prominent and to be present for at least two weeks. Symptoms 1 and 2 MUST be present.

1. Depressed mood present most of the day nearly
every day for the two weeks.
2. Loss of interest or inability to derive any
pleasure (most of the day nearly every day).
3. Significant weight change (> 5% of body weight
loss or gain) or significant change (loss or
gain) in appetite nearly every day.
4. Sleep disturbance: insomnia (such as difficulty
falling asleep, frequent awakening,
earlier-than-usual awakening despite fatigue)
or hypersomnia (excessive sleeping).
5. Physical signs of either agitation/restlessness
or of retardation/slowness.
6. Lack of energy or significant fatigue.
7. Feelings and thoughts of worthlessness
or excessive guilt.
8. Impaired concentration or indecisiveness.
9. Suicidality (ranging from thoughts to attempts).

Source: The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual -
Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) of the American
Psychiatric Association (1994)

Most major depressions are episodic in nature. That is, they tend to be discrete episodes that—in most cases—remit at least partially. Unfortunately, the chances of having additional depressive episodes increase with each major depression. For instance, a person who has experienced two depressive episodes is estimated to have a 50 percent risk of having another depressive episode. If you look closely at the criteria listed in the illustration above you will note that a fairly wide variety of symptoms may characterize different cases of depression.

Depression and Weight
Let’s take another look at the symptoms of depression in the illustration above. Notice that appetite may either increase or decrease with depression or that weight may increase or decrease during a depression episode. The more typical types of depression result in weight loss and a decrease in appetite. Insomnia and physical agitation frequently accompany this pattern. It is generally thought that about 60–65 percent of depressed individuals lose weight during a depression episode. However, some individuals gain weight when they are depressed.

     A significant portion (estimated at one-third) of depressed individuals gains weight during a depression. Often referred to as atypical depressions, weight gain, increased appetite, hypersomnia, fatigue, and sometimes “heavy legs” are the prominent physical symptoms that accompany the sadness or loss of interest. The weight gain experienced by these individuals can be substantial. In studies conducted by Dr. Stunkard and his colleagues at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine patients gained an average of 19 pounds during one depressive episode. This pattern of depression and weight gain was more common in women than men. It typically began at an earlier age than the more typical depressions (i.e., weight loss, decreased appetite, etc.) and became chronic with incomplete recovery between successive episodes.

An interesting question that researchers have tried to answer is, “Does a person’s weight change in the same manner from depression to depression?” Dr. Stunkard and researchers from the University of Pittsburgh found that 85 percent of 53 depressed persons who experienced two major depressions experienced the same weight changes. During two separate depressions, 32 percent of the participants gained weight, 44 percent lost weight, and 9 percent had no change. The amount of weight change each person experienced in the two depressions was also very consistent. This consistency during recurrent depressions is particularly interesting since many aspects of depression are not consistent from one episode to the next. Thus, roughly one-third of persons with recurrent depression are likely to gain weight each time they experience a depression episode. Over time, the total weight gain can be substantial.

Who Gains and Who Loses?
Since it seems that individuals are consistent in their pattern of weight change when depressed, the next question is “who gains weight and who loses weight?” Dr. Stunkard and his colleagues looked at two factors in trying to answer this question:
1.  Body mass index (weight taking into account height) and
2.  Disinhibition (i.e., the tendency to lose control over eating under certain circumstances,
such as when experiencing negative emotions).

In two studies, depressed people who were disinhibited were the most likely to consistently gain weight during repeated depressions. However, it seems that body mass index was responsible for much of the association. In other words, heavier people are most likely to gain weight repeatedly, and lighter people are most likely to consistently lose weight during repeated depressions. Although we do not know why heavier people are likely to gain more during depressions, this finding is useful to alert people to that risk.

Overweight and Depression
Are overweight persons susceptible to depression? Most studies have found that slightly overweight persons do not differ from average-weight persons in rates of depression. The picture seems quite different, however, for persons who are substantially overweight and for overweight persons who binge eat. Dr. Donald Black and his colleagues at the University of Iowa School of Medicine found that 19.3 percent of 88 morbidly obese persons (i.e., more than 100 percent over ideal body weight) had histories of major depression versus just 5.3 percent of 76 average-weight persons. Dr. Susan Yanovski and her colleagues at the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases found that 14 percent of overweight persons and 51 percent of overweight persons with binge eating disorder suffered from major depression. A recent study at Yale found similar rates of current depression and histories of depression in overweight males (20 and 52 percent respectively) and females (20 and 42 percent respectively) with binge eating disorder.

Specific Depressions and Weight
Different types of depression exist in addition to Major Depressive Disorder, and these may also be linked in complex ways to weight changes. Let’s look at Bipolar Disorder as an example. Bipolar Disorder involves substantial mood swings from mania (i.e., extreme energy) to depression. Aside from the complex associations between different patterns of mood swings and weight, bipolar disorder alerts us to a different and indirect link between depression and weight. The consensus treatment of choice for bipolar disorder involves the use of lithium carbonate. We know long-term treatment with lithium produces weight gain, and this weight gain is most likely to occur in individuals who are already overweight. Unfortunately, some treatments chosen for certain types of depression may contribute to weight gain.

Seasonal Affective Disorder
     In 1984, Dr. Norman Rosenthal and colleagues, in studies performed in the Clinical Psychobiology Branch of the National Institutes of Health, identified a subset of persons who experienced periods of depression. These periods seemed to closely follow seasonal changes. In the original study, the researchers identified 29 patients who regularly developed major depression during the autumn and winter months. The depression would improve dramatically during the summer months. This pattern of depression—termed Seasonal Affective Disorder—is frequently accompanied by substantial weight gain (in as many as 75 percent of cases) and increased appetite, carbohydrate craving, increased sleep, and constant fatigue.

Since Dr. Rosenthal’s 1984 study, several studies in the United States and Europe have verified this specific form of depression. A more recent study by Dr. Krauuchi and his colleagues at the Psychiatric University Clinic in Switzerland found that persons with Seasonal Affective Disorder frequently engaged in emotional eating (i.e., excessive eating in response to negative feelings, depression, irritability, and anxiety) and “external eating” (i.e., eating in response to food stimuli regardless of whether hungry or not). These individuals have a tendency to eat large portions of carbohydrates (sweets) when feeling badly. Persons with Seasonal Affective Disorder also frequently report body image concerns and problematic eating attitudes that are similar to persons with bulimia and binge eating problems.

Several studies have found that Seasonal Affective Disorder can be effectively treated with a specific form of light therapy. Using bright artificial light produces rapid and substantial reduction in the depression and appetite symptoms. An intriguing finding from these studies is that persons who frequently eat high amounts of sweets late in the day are most likely to benefit from light therapy for the Seasonal Affective Disorder.

Depression Treatment
Although depression is a serious problem, effective treatments are readily available. Several medication and therapy options are available. A mental health professional can help determine the best treatment option.

Medication Treatments
A number of antidepressant medications are available. The antidepressant medications can be divided into three classes:
1.  Tricyclics,
2.  Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI), and
3.  Serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRI)

Although there is some variability, treatment studies have generally found that approximately 60 to 75 percent of depressed patients derive some benefit from antidepressant medications.

The choice of a specific antidepressant for a particular individual is a complex decision best made by a psychiatrist. In general, the type of depressive symptoms and experience with antidepressant medications may influence the psychiatrist’s decision. Increasingly, psychiatrists view the newer class of SRIs as the starting point for treatment since their rates of success are slightly higher than the older antidepressants. They also tend to have more benign side-effect patterns. This may be especially relevant for overweight persons since SRI antidepressants (e.g., fluoxetine) have been reported in some studies to produce weight loss (Editor’s Note: See Dhurandhar NV, Atkinson RL. Recent advances in the treatment of obesity. The Weight Control Digest. March/April 1997). At a minimum, the SRIs are much less likely to produce the weight gain sometimes observed with the tricylic antidepressants.

In the July/August 1997 issue of The Weight Control Digest, Dr. Devlin and I reviewed the preliminary status and support for tricyclic and SRI antidepressants for Binge Eating Disorder. These two classes of medication used at similar or slightly higher doses than used for depression, produced substantial short-term reductions in binge eating but little or no change in weight.

Psychotherapy Treatments
In cases of depression, two psychological treatments have consistently received support in carefully conducted studies—cognitive behavioral therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy. Cognitive behavioral therapy is an active and collaborative therapy in which the client learns about maladaptive behaviors and ways of thinking. Clients learn to replace these behaviors with healthier coping and problem-solving skills and more objective ways of thinking. In interpersonal psychotherapy, the focus is on current interpersonal problems associated with the onset or maintenance of the depression. Clients focus on improving their social skills, handling interpersonal disputes, transitions, and grief.

Cognitive behavioral therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy (adapted for the specific needs of persons with eating disorders) are considered the “treatments of choice” for bulimia. Both treatments have also received impressive preliminary support for Binge Eating Disorder. For overweight persons with Binge Eating Disorder, studies have shown both treatment options reduce or eliminate binge eating in roughly 75 percent of cases. However, for reasons not yet understood, they do not seem to result in weight loss. Although many clinicians claim to incorporate certain elements of these treatments into their therapy approaches, many are not qualified or specifically trained in these approaches. If you are seeking treatment, be sure to ask.

What Treatments are Best?
Too often, professionals offer their patients treatments that they are most familiar with or that they have had the most experience. In the case of depression and certain eating-related problems (e.g., Binge Eating Disorder and bulimia nervosa) the available scientific evidence suggests that specific treatments should be considered first. These treatments are suggested as the first course of treatment because they have received scientific support from controlled studies. Scientists call such treatments “empirically-validated” approaches. It is my recommendation also that these treatments should be the first line of treatment. If a professional is not trained in the use of a particular treatment, the patient should be referred to a health profession with appropriate training and experience.

Combination Treatments
Does combining medication and psychological therapy for depression produce greater benefit than either alone? The evidence is mixed. Some studies show greater benefit from the combination approach, while other studies show cognitive behavioral therapy roughly equal to the combination of cognitive behavioral plus medication. The weight change implications of combination treatments has not been well studied. The focus of these studies has been on the elimination of the debilitating (and even life-threatening) depression.

Does combining medication and psychological therapy for binge eating in overweight persons produce an added benefit for the binge eating, the weight, or level of depression? To date, three studies have tested whether adding antidepressants to either cognitive behavioral therapy or to behavioral weight loss treatments produced any added benefit with overweight binge eaters. Two types of SRI antidepressants (fluvoxamine and fluoxetine) and one type of tricyclic antidepressant (desipramine) have been studied. The addition of the SRI fluvoxamine to these treatments was associated with a greater reduction in depressive symptoms, but no added improvement in eating or weight. Fluoxetine, in contrast, when combined with individual behavioral therapy resulted in added weight loss and probable improvement in binge eating, but had no added benefit as regards depressive symptoms. The tricyclic antidepressant desipramine did not seem to improve the response to behavioral weight loss treatment.

If the depression completely interferes with daily functioning and is coupled with thoughts of suicide, inpatient hospitalization may be warranted. We can successfully treat most cases of depression, however, without hospitalization. Although earlier studies suggested that antidepressant medications might be preferable, the most recent studies have shown that interpersonal therapy and especially cognitive behavioral therapy are quite effective even with moderate to severe depressions.

Future Trends
Many interesting questions remain about the complex relationships between depression and overweight. Currently, researchers are conducting a variety of studies that may address these important questions. For instance, my colleagues and I at the Yale University School of Medicine are directly comparing the effectiveness of antidepressant treatments and cognitive behavioral therapies both—singly and in combination. We are paying particular attention to whether a history or presence of depression influences who benefits from the treatments and what kinds of weight changes occur in persons with depression.

Concluding Thoughts
Depression and weight are related in complex ways and different relationship may exist in different people. Depression is a serious problem that often goes undetected. I hope that the information contained here about depression (symptoms, relationship to overweight, and treatments) is useful to clients and professionals alike. The good news is that there are effective treatments for depression. Perhaps greater attention to special needs of overweight persons during periods of depression may forestall the process of additional weight gain. How to do this safely and effectively represents a daunting challenge. For now, the best advice might be to reestablish lifestyle balance and activity as quickly as emotionally possible.

About the Author
Carlos M. Grilo, Ph.D., is the Director of Psychology and Director of the Eating Disorder Program at the Yale Psychiatric Institute and Assistant Professor of Psychiatry at the Yale University School of Medicine. Dr. Grilo’s major research and clinical emphasis is on eating and weight disorders. Dr. Grilo is currently the Principal Investigator on two research studies funded by the National Institutes of Health testing treatments for eating disorders. In addition, Dr. Grilo is the co-Principal Investigator on a research study examining the course of personality and depression over time in adults. This study will provide information about the nature of depression and its symptoms over time and how these symptoms influence psychological and social functioning.

May 6th, 2006

Effective Treatment of a Mother’s Depression Reduces Risk of Psychiatric Disorders in Her Children

Posted by depressionandanxietytreatment in anxiety treatment
By: JAMA on Mar 21 2006 17:25:36

Mother’s Depression Treatment

Remission of a mother’s depression within the first three months of treatment decreases the likelihood of her children having psychiatric disorders, such as mood or disruptive behavior disorders, within the same time period. Mothers who remain depressed increase the risk of her children having these disorders, according to a study in the March 22/29 issue of JAMA, a theme issue on women’s health.

Lead author Myrna M. Weissman, Ph.D., of Columbia University Medical Center and the New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, presented the findings of the study today at a JAMA media briefing on women’s health in New York.

Parental depression is among the most consistent risk factors for childhood anxiety and disruptive behavior disorders and for major depression, with more than a 2- to 3-fold increased risk in offspring of depressed parents compared with controls, according to background information in the article. These offspring problems often begin before puberty, continue into adolescence and adulthood, and can be transmitted to the next generation. The long-term affects include impaired social and occupational functioning and increased risk of medical problems. Although early onset major depression is highly familial and has a strong genetic component, environmental factors, such as disrupted parent-child attachment and poor parent-child bonding may affect the impact of parental depression on children’s symptoms.

Dr. Weissman and colleagues examined whether effective treatment of a mother’s depression with medication is associated with reduction of psychopathological symptoms and disorders in their children. The study included 151 mother-child pairs in 8 primary care and 11 psychiatric outpatient clinics who were part of the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial, which was conducted between December 2001 and April 2004. The mothers in the trial were treated with medication for depression. The children, aged 7 to 17 years, were assessed by a team of evaluators not involved in maternal treatment and unaware of maternal outcomes.

The researchers found that after 3 months of medication treatment there was an overall 11 percent decrease in rates of diagnoses (from 35 percent to 24 percent) in children of mothers in remission vs. an 8 percent increase (from 35 percent to 43 percent) in children of mothers with continuing depression. Of the offspring who had psychiatric diagnoses at baseline and whose mother’s depression remitted, 33 percent of the children’s own diagnoses had remitted, whereas only 12 percent of the children of women whose depression remained lost their diagnosis. Of the children who had no psychiatric disorder at baseline, all remained free of psychiatric disorders at the 3-month follow-up if the maternal depression remitted, whereas 17 percent of children of mothers who remained depressed had an onset or relapse over this period

“To our knowledge, this is the first published study to document prospectively the relation between remission of a mother’s depression and her child’s clinical state. These findings are intriguing because they suggest that an environmental influence (i.e., the impact of maternal depression remission) had a measurable impact on the child’s psychopathology,” the authors write. “Our studies suggest that a reduction in stress associated with maternal remission may reverse the long-standing symptoms in children who are likely to be genetically vulnerable, although we have not genotyped the children in the study.”

“From a clinical vantage point, our findings suggest that vigorous treatment of depressed mothers to achieve remission is associated with positive outcomes in their children as well, whereas failure to treat depressed mothers may increase the burden of illness in their children. At a time when there are many questions about the appropriate and safe treatment of psychiatric disorders in children, these findings suggest that it is important to provide vigorous treatment to mothers if they are depressed,” the researchers conclude. (JAMA. 2006;295:1389-1398)

April 28th, 2006

Assessing anxiety and depression in primary care

Posted by depressionandanxietytreatment in anxiety treatment
Synopsis
  • Depressive and anxiety disorders are common in primary care settings, yet up to half the patients who present with these disorders may not be diagnosed and others may not be treated.
  • The cornerstone of detection is an understanding of the common presenting symptoms and syndromes.
  • Patients with depression or anxiety frequently present complaining of physical symptoms, which may obscure the psychiatric diagnosis.
  • The doctor’s consultation technique is important: an empathic style, open questions and a willingness to hear the patient out will help reveal the diagnosis.
  • Clinical depression is diagnosed when there are at least three or four symptoms (low mood, loss of interest, sleep disturbance, lost concentration, fatigue, disturbed appetite, agitation or retardation, feelings of worthlessness or guilt, suicidal thoughts)
    present every day for at least two weeks.
  • Anxiety disorders include panic disorder, phobias, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder and generalised anxiety disorder.
  • Screening tools (simple questionnaires designed to identify signs and symptoms of anxiety and depression) can be effective.
  • Once a depressive or anxiety disorder is detected, possible causes to be explored include underlying medical conditions, psychiatric conditions, and drug or alcohol use.

Introduction
Depressive and anxiety disorders are common, occurring in up to 25% of primary care patients,1 and are more disabling, both socially and in terms of physical functioning, than many chronic physical illnesses, such as diabetes, hypertension, arthritis and back pain.2,3 The economic impact is immense, both in direct costs to health care systems and in indirect costs to the community.4 Despite this, there is considerable evidence that the medical profession deals poorly with these disorders. In up to half of patients presenting with anxiety or depression, the diagnosis is missed, and in those who are recognised a significant proportion are not treated.1,5Most patients with these disorders present and are managed in primary care settings.6,7 This article reviews the prevalence, recognition and assessment of depressive and anxiety disorders in primary care.

Prevalence of depression and anxiety in primary care
The most thorough large-scale study is the World Health Organization [WHO] study on psychological disorders in primary care.1 Over 25 000 consecutive adults were screened at 15 sites in 14 countries. Over 5 000 were further assessed with detailed psychiatric interviews. A quarter had a recognisable mental disorder, the commonest being a depressive disorder (11.7%) or an anxiety disorder (10.5%), with 4.6% having both. Only half of the mental disorders were recognised by the primary care physician; among those patients with a recognised mental disorder, half were offered drug treatment.A similar study in Australia of 4867 patients of 117 general practitioners found that 35.6% had elevated scores on a screening test for mental illness, while 20.6% had been treated for anxiety or depression in the previous 12 months. Treatments included medications (52%), referral to a specialist (24%) and non-drug advice (70%), with 91% of patients reporting their treatment or advice as reasonably good or very good.

The high prevalence rates in primary care patients are not surprising in view of large community surveys, such as the National Comorbidity Study in the United States,8 which reported a 12-month prevalence of 11.3% for depressive disorders and 17.2% for anxiety disorders.


Barriers to recognising depression and anxiety
The reasons behind the non-recognition of many cases of anxiety and depressive disorders in primary care are complex and poorly understood, despite a number of studies and reviews addressing this issue.4,6,9,10One way of viewing the problem is to consider the various “hurdles” that must be overcome on the path from being ill to receiving treatment. These include:

  1. The patient recognising that he or she is unwell. Often patients consider their psychiatric problems as “their lot in life”, and something that cannot change.
  2. The patient recognising that a doctor can help. Often patients will present with problems associated with anxiety or depression, without thinking the doctor can help with the anxiety or depression itself. This is especially common with depression, where the sufferer may feel hopeless and beyond help.
  3. The doctor recognising the mental illness.
  4. The doctor recognising the need to treat and enlist specialist services where necessary.

The barriers at the third hurdle have been best studied and are generally divided into those related to the doctor, the patient, or the consultation.

The doctor Most general practitioners have had little formal psychiatric training and have practised in an environment where excluding physical illness is the primary focus of attention. Anxiety and depression become diagnoses of exclusion and, as such, are considered late. Perceptions about mental illness are often negative, with fears of alienating patients if such diagnoses are made. Practitioners sometimes justify depression and anxiety as understandable responses to the vicissitudes of life. Yet, although depression and anxiety are often understandable, they are disabling and treatable, and should not be passed over.Falsely negative perceptions about treatment may also lead to reluctance in diagnosing mental illness.

Finally, personal issues for the doctor may also hinder recognition: some feel uncomfortable dealing with emotions and the interpersonal issues that are associated with anxiety and depression.

The consultation Most general practice consultations last 10-15 minutes, and many patients present with more than one problem. The presenting symptoms of mental illness are rarely the classical descriptions seen in text books, which are written with psychiatric settings in mind.Studies of interview characteristics suggest that the recognition rates of mental illness improve if the doctor adopts an empathic style (i.e., demonstrated ability to take the patient’s viewpoint), lets the patient lead the interview, asks direct psychologically oriented questions early in the interview, responds to non-verbal cues, listens attentively, tolerates silences, maintains eye contact, avoids closed-ended questions about physical symptoms (i.e., Yes/No questions), and avoids interrupting the patient.6,9
The patientCase history:
A man anxious about his health
Some studies suggest that most patients with anxiety or depressive disorders initially present with somatic complaints (see the Case history).4 Many patients are not aware of the emotional origin of their symptoms. They may fear stigmatisation, or fear that they are “going crazy”.Depression and anxiety are particularly likely to be missed when they are associated with physical illness or another psychiatric illness (especially dementia, schizophrenia and drug and alcohol disorders), when symptoms are of less recent origin, and when there are cultural differences between the patient and doctor.4,10

Recognising depressive and anxiety disorders
Before depressive and anxiety disorders can be adequately assessed, they must be recognised. Goldberg6 has outlined three fundamental approaches to the problem:

  1. improving the interview technique of primary carers
  2. the use of screening tools, and
  3. bringing mental health services into primary care settings.

Suggestions to improve interviewing have included the use of video feedback techniques,10 restructuring consultations to allow extended and repeated interviews, and education about situations in which to be particularly vigilant (e.g., women in the postnatal period).

Other authors have suggested educational efforts need to be broadened to decrease the burden on doctors.9 Community campaigns to raise awareness about mental illness are under way in Australia and elsewhere. Information in surgeries, such as posters and videos, can help patients recognise their problems and help them feel comfortable discussing these issues with their doctor. Finally, other staff members, such as nurses, can be better trained to recognise mental illness.


Assessing depression
Box 1:
SAD-A FACES - a mnemonic for the core symptoms of depression
Although severe depression is generally readily recognised, milder forms are often difficult to distinguish from emotional changes associated with everyday life. Bereavement, job loss, divorce, and other life events can result in a depressive reaction of short duration. As a general rule, clinical depression is diagnosed when there are at least three or four core symptoms (Box 1) present every day for a minimum of two weeks.Recently published clinical practice guidelines (freely available from the National Health and Medical Research Council) discuss the assessment of depression in young people.11,12

Mental state examination
The mental state examination can be quite variable depending on the severity of the depression. Generalised psychomotor retardation is the commonest sign, although agitation can also occur. Lack of attention to personal grooming and hygiene may also be evident. The speech may be slow and monotonous. The affect is usually, but not always, depressed, and often anxious or irritable, with the patient easily moved to tears (although in more severe depression the patient often describes being emotionally blunted and “beyond tears”). The thought content reveals themes of hopelessness and helplessness, with a negative view of the self, world and future. Suicidal ideas and plans may be evident. In severe depression delusions may occur, and these are usually mood-congruent, with themes such as poverty, failure, guilt, or terminal somatic illnesses (such as “rotting” internal organs). Perceptual disturbances such as hallucinations are less common, but can occur in severe depression.

Cognitive function is intact, although in severe depression the patient may not have the interest or energy to answer, making cognitive assessment difficult.

The depressive syndromes
The Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV)13 classifies the mood disorders into the depressive disorders and the bipolar disorders (previously called manic-depressive illness).

The depressive disorders are:

Major depressive disorder:
Five or more symptoms present for at least two weeks, with a significant impairment in occupational or social functioning.

Dysthymic disorder:
Chronic but mild depression. There are more than two (but fewer than five) symptoms present most of the time for at least two years. The symptoms must cause significant distress or impairment.

Depressive disorder not otherwise specified:
Depression is the central feature, but the pattern does not fit the above disorders, or adjustment disorder (see below). It includes premenstrual depression, recurrent brief depression and other, less established, syndromes.

Adjustment disorders:
These are classified separately to depressive disorders, and refer to clinically significant emotional or behavioural symptoms related to depression, anxiety, or both, occurring in response to identifiable psychosocial stressors. They develop within three months of the stressor, and resolve within six months, and are not severe enough to meet criteria for major depressive disorder.


Assessment of anxiety
Box 2:
Signs and symptoms of anxiety
Anxiety is an emotion experienced by all to varying degrees, but it is difficult to define. It is similar to fear and apprehension, which serve adaptive functions in preparing people for danger, but occurs in the absence of a specific danger and usually in response to anticipated problems or hazards. In anxiety disorders, symptoms are out of proportion to the perceived threat, restrict activity, do not dissipate with reassurance and may be linked to thoughts or actions which seem excessive or ridiculous.14General anxiety symptoms can be classified broadly into cognitive, somatic and psychological symptoms (Box 2).

If patients report significant anxiety symptoms, specific questions about the various syndromes should follow.

The anxiety syndromes
DSM-IV13 classifies the anxiety disorders as follows:

Panic disorder
is characterised by recurrent, unexpected panic attacks, at least one of which has been followed by one or more months of persistent concern about having additional attacks, worry about the implication of the attack (e.g., fear of going crazy or having a heart attack), or a significant change in behaviour. Panic attacks are sudden, unexpected attacks of anxiety that are not necessarily linked to any cue. Agoraphobia often develops, which is essentially a fear of being in places or situations from which escape may be difficult should a panic attack occur, leading to avoidance of many activities.

Phobias
are more circumscribed forms of anxiety. Simple phobia involves persistent, excessive or unreasonable fear of specific objects or situations, with subsequent avoidance of such objects or situations. Social phobia is the fear of any situation where public scrutiny may be possible, usually with the fear of having a panic attack, or behaving in a way that is embarrassing or humiliating.

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)
involves specific cognitive and behavioural symptoms accompanying the feelings of anxiety. These include obsessional thoughts (recurrent thoughts, impulses or images that are experienced as intrusive and inappropriate and that cause marked anxiety), and compulsions (repetitive behaviours or mental acts that the person feels driven to perform in response to an obsession in order to reduce anxiety).

OCD is usually a chronic lifelong illness, with a waxing-and-waning course. The most frequent presenting obsessions are those related to contamination, pathological doubt (e.g., “Did I turn off the stove?”), somatisation and a need for symmetry. Frequent compulsions include the need to wash, check and count. The diagnosis of OCD should be made when the symptoms are severe, persistent and distressing.

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
occurs after an acutely distressing or catastrophic event. Symptoms include re-experiencing the trauma (e.g., recurrent dreams of the event, flashbacks), persistent avoidance of stimuli associated with the event, and persistent symptoms of increased arousal (hypervigilance, irritability, exaggerated startle response). A diagnosis of PTSD is made if the symptoms are present for at least one month and cause clinically significant distress or impairment in functioning.

Generalised anxiety disorder
is excessive anxiety and worry, occurring most days for more than six months. It refers to excessive anxiety in a range of situations that does not fit into any of the more common syndromes.


Common presentations
In clinical situations, patients rarely present with such classical symptoms and signs. Studies in primary care settings suggest that 50%-95% of psychiatric patients initially present with somatic complaints,6 or “somatisation”. In practice, these presentations are characterised by physical symptoms (often more than one) that are vague and difficult to explain in terms of organic disease.This situation should sound warning bells for depression or anxiety. In one study, patients were divided according to whether their presenting complaints were related to a medical diagnosis or not. In those with no medical diagnosis, 38%-45% were found to have a psychiatric disorder (mostly anxiety or depression), compared with 15% in the group with a medical disorder.15 Typical symptoms were fatigue, gastrointestinal complaints, dizziness, joint pain, weight loss, chest pain and headache.

Other situations in which to be particularly vigilant for depressive and anxiety disorders are:

  • patients with chronic physical illness, especially involving the neurological system (e.g., Parkinson’s disease, strokes, multiple sclerosis)
  • patients with chronic pain
  • the elderly, especially the bereaved and those living alone or in nursing homes
  • women in the postnatal period
  • adolescents with behaviour problems.

Screening tests for depression and anxiety
Box 3:
A screening test for anxiety and depression
Screening tests for depression and anxiety are simply questionnaires with a score that predicts the diagnosis. They may be rated by the doctor or patient and are helpful in improving recognition rates.5,16,17Various screening tests have been studied in primary care settings. These include PRIME-MD,18 the General Health Questionnaire,19 the Beck Depression Inventory,20 and the Zung Self-Rated Depression Scale.21

Doctor-rated screening tests are a more structured way of interviewing and rating the severity of the illness. Patient-rated screening tests have the advantage of being completed in the patient’s own time, and hence allowing more widespread and time-efficient screening. PRIME-MD (primary care evaluation of mental disorders) combines a patient questionnaire to screen for common mental disorders and a clinician evaluation guide to gain further diagnostic information in areas which drew affirmative responses from the patient.

A more simple doctor-rated screening test, developed using latent trait analysis by Goldberg et al.,22 is shown in Box 3.

Screening questionnaires can be used routinely in all new patients, or used selectively in high risk groups. Disadvantages include the time needed for training, concerns about their usefulness, and the time taken for completion.


Exploring the causes of depression and anxiety
Depression and anxiety may occur as primary disorders or secondary to a range of medical conditions, drug use or other psychiatric disorders. The causes of primary depression and anxiety are beyond the scope of this review, but include biological factors such as genetics, neurotransmitter abnormalities, neuroendocrine abnormalities and psychosocial factors (life events, environmental stress, and premorbid personality).In the primary care setting it is the secondary causes that need to be excluded.
Medical conditions A range of medical conditions are associated with depression and/or anxiety, highlighting the importance of thorough physical examinations and basic investigations. Most standard textbooks include long lists for both anxiety and depression. The more common conditions associated with depression include endocrine disorders (hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, Cushing’s disease and Addison’s disease), infections (infectious mononucleosis, influenza, tertiary syphilis and AIDS), neurological disorders (multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease) and cerebrovascular disorders. Underlying malignancies should also be considered.For anxiety disorders, consider endocrine disorders such as thyroid, parathyroid, and adrenal dysfunction (phaeochromocytoma), seizure disorders and cardiac conditions such as arrhythmias, supraventricular tachycardia, and mitral-valve prolapse.

Depression may arise as a psychological response to physical illness, especially if the illness is life-threatening, chronic, or associated with pain. As many as one-fifth of general medical inpatients show some evidence of depression.23 Alternatively, depression may be a direct consequence of the physical illness. Both Cushing’s disease and hypothyroidism are well known examples of endocrinopathies for which depression may be the first manifestation. The same is true for anxiety, where hyperthyroidism and vitamin B12 deficiency are frequently associated with anxiety symptoms.

Pharmacological agents The list of drugs suspected of causing depression or anxiety is long.24 While for some of the drugs the evidence is strong (e.g., sympathomimetics and anxiety; high dose reserpine and depression), for most drugs the evidence is weak, often consisting only of case reports.Drugs commonly associated with depression are antihypertensive agents, corticosteroids, oral contraceptives and antineoplastic agents.24 Recreational drugs such as alcohol and amphetamines can cause depression either during intoxication or withdrawal.

Drugs commonly associated with anxiety are sympathomimetics such as amphetamines, cocaine and caffeine. Drugs that increase serotonin release, such as LSD and MDMA (”ecstasy”), can cause acute and chronic anxiety. Prescription medications to consider include sympathomimetics, antihypertensives (especially captopril), and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.25

Careful questioning about the timing of the drug dose in relation to the symptoms is important. If suspected, the drug should be withdrawn and the patient monitored for a correlation between relief of symptoms and washout (about five half-lives) to confirm or refute the diagnosis.

Psychiatric disorders Depressive disorders and anxiety disorders often coexist and are often secondary to other psychiatric disorders.The comorbidity between depression and anxiety is so high that debate continues as to whether they are categorically separate disorders or part of a continuum.26,27 For example, studies suggest that 30%-40% of patients with panic disorder or OCD also have depression.28,29

Comorbidity between anxiety disorders is common (e.g., 30% of patients with OCD report simple or social phobias, and 15% report panic disorder).29

Comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders is also common. Depression can be a feature of virtually any psychiatric disorder. Particularly high rates of depression are found in alcohol-related disorders, eating disorders, schizophrenia and somatoform disorders.30

The key comorbid psychiatric disorders to explore in anxiety disorders (apart from depression) are substance-related disorders (especially alcohol), schizophrenia and dementia.

Determining which disorder is primary and which secondary is difficult. For example, an anxious patient may become alcohol dependent through years of self-medication, or alcohol dependence may result in chronic anxiety. Finally, some independent factor, such as a genetic predisposition or tumultuous life events, may have led to both. Careful history-taking to determine the temporal relationship, with corroborative information from friends or relatives, helps in some cases. In others, unravelling which disorder came first is impossible.


When to refer to specialist services
The main difficulty in referring to specialist psychiatric services is discussing the referral with the patient. The stigma attached to mental illness continues despite medical and community education programs. As a consequence, referral needs to be handled tactfully. Discussing emotional factors in illness, explaining and demystifying psychiatric services and addressing patient fears and beliefs about psychiatrists are key elements in the process.Situations in which referral should be considered include:

  • severe depression or anxiety
  • high suicide risk
  • failure to respond to treatment
  • uncertainty about the diagnosis
  • possible organic brain disease or dementia
  • the need for greater resources
  • adolescent patients
  • comorbidity with drugs or alcohol
  • patients not accepting recommended advice or treatment.

References
  1. Sartorius N, Ustun TB, Lecrubier Y, Wittchen HV. Depression comorbid with anxiety: Results from the WHO study on psychological disorders in primary health care. Br J Psychiatry 1996; 168 Suppl 30: S38-S43.
  2. Wells KB, Stewart A, Mays RD, et al. The functioning and well-being of depressed patients: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA 1989; 262: 914-919.
  3. Ormel J, VanKorff M, Ustun TB, et al. Common mental disorders and disability across cultures. Results from the WHO Collaborative Study on Psychological Problems in General Health Care. JAMA 1994; 272: 1741-1748.
  4. Montano CB. Recognition and treatment of depression in a primary care setting. J Clin Psychiatry 1994; 55 Suppl 12: S18-S34.
  5. Harris MF, Silove D, Kehog E, et al. Anxiety and depression in general practice patients: prevalence and management. Med J Aust 1996; 164: 526-529.
  6. G